Re: /unix linked to /usr/lib/boot/unix_mp - but it's a single processor

From: Bill Verzal (Bill_Verzal@BCBSIL.COM)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 12:27:14 EST


One more...

lslpp -f bos.up
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bill Verzal
Technical Consultant
Forbes Technical Consulting
(312) 653-3684
bill_verzal@bcbsil.com
billverzal@imcingular.com (Pager)
888-428-4025 (Pager)
MailStop: 27.202B

                    "Michelle
                    DeVault" To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
                    <adsmigmo@YAHO cc:
                    O.COM> Subject: Re: /unix linked to /usr/lib/boot/unix_mp - but it's a
                    Sent by: "IBM single processor
                    AIX Discussion
                    List"
                    <aix-l@Princet
                    on.EDU>

                    02/06/2003
                    10:54 AM
                    Please respond
                    to "IBM AIX
                    Discussion
                    List"

server/# lslpp -l bos.acct
  Fileset Level State
Description

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: /usr/lib/objrepos
  bos.acct 4.3.3.79 COMMITTED
Accounting Services

Path: /etc/objrepos
  bos.acct 4.3.3.75 COMMITTED
Accounting Services

server/# lslpp -l bos.mp
lslpp: 0504-132 Fileset bos.mp not installed.

server/# lslpp -l bos.up
  Fileset Level State
Description

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path: /usr/lib/objrepos
  bos.up 4.3.3.81 COMMITTED Base
Operating System Uniprocessor Runtime

Path: /etc/objrepos
  bos.up 4.3.3.78 COMMITTED Base
Operating System Uniprocessor Runtime

--- Bill Verzal <Bill_Verzal@BCBSIL.COM> wrote:
> post output of:
>
> lslpp -l bos.acct
> lslpp -l bos.mp
> lslpp -l bos.up
>
> BV
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> Bill Verzal
> Technical Consultant
> Forbes Technical Consulting
> (312) 653-3684
> bill_verzal@bcbsil.com
> billverzal@imcingular.com (Pager)
> 888-428-4025 (Pager)
> MailStop: 27.202B
>
>
>
> "Michelle
> DeVault" To:
> aix-l@Princeton.EDU
> <adsmigmo@YAHO cc:
> O.COM> Subject:
> Re: /unix linked to /usr/lib/boot/unix_mp - but
> it's a
> Sent by: "IBM single
> processor
> AIX Discussion
> List"
> <aix-l@Princet
> on.EDU>
>
>
> 02/06/2003
> 10:32 AM
> Please respond
> to "IBM AIX
> Discussion
> List"
>
>
>
>
>
>
> server/# sar -P ALL 1 3
> sadc: 0551-109 Warning: The kernel data structures
> are
> not consistent.
> sadc: 0551-109 Warning: The kernel data structures
> are
> not consistent.
>
> AIX server 3 4 ########## 02/06/03
>
> 10:28:21 cpu %usr %sys %wio %idle
> sar: 0551-211 Specify a positive integer for the
> time
> change.
> sar: 0551-211 Specify a positive integer for the
> time
> change.
> sar: 0551-211 Specify a positive integer for the
> time
> change.
>
>
> --- Bill Verzal <Bill_Verzal@BCBSIL.COM> wrote:
> > Because if you decide to add an additional CPU,
> > you'll need to change it
> > again.
> >
> > The MP kernel has the same functionality as the UP
> > kernel, excepts it adds
> > the MP extensions.
> >
> > I stand my ground - don't change it.
> >
> > What is wrong with sar ?
> >
> > BV
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> >
> > Bill Verzal
> > Technical Consultant
> > Forbes Technical Consulting
> > (312) 653-3684
> > bill_verzal@bcbsil.com
> > billverzal@imcingular.com (Pager)
> > 888-428-4025 (Pager)
> > MailStop: 27.202B
> >
> >
> >
> > "Michelle
> > DeVault" To:
> > aix-l@Princeton.EDU
> > <adsmigmo@YAHO cc:
> > O.COM> Subject:
> > Re: /unix linked to /usr/lib/boot/unix_mp - but
> > it's a
> > Sent by: "IBM single
> > processor
> > AIX Discussion
> > List"
> > <aix-l@Princet
> > on.EDU>
> >
> >
> > 02/06/2003
> > 09:36 AM
> > Please respond
> > to "IBM AIX
> > Discussion
> > List"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hmmm, but IBM support told me I should.
> >
> > The reason I noticed it was that I was trying to
> get
> > sar to work. I did what the IBM instructions say
> to
> > do:
> > 1. uncomment the stuff in adm's crontab
> > 2. uncomment the stuff in /etc/rc
> > 3. Reboot.
> >
> > Still couldn't get sar to run. Called IBM support
> > back and they said to:
> >
> > 1. link /unix to /usr/lib/boot/unix_up
> > 2. link /usr/lib/boot/unix to
> /usr/lib/boot/unix_up
> > 3. bosboot -ad /usr/ipldevice
> > 4. reboot
> >
> > I can't reboot the machine until Sunday, so this
> is
> > on
> > hold until then.
> >
> > Why do you say "Don't change it"?
> >
> > M.
> >
> >
> > --- Bill Verzal <Bill_Verzal@BCBSIL.COM> wrote:
> > > I have found that this is the case if the
> install
> > > detects a system that is
> > > MP capable, even if it has only one processor.
> > >
> > > Don't change it.
> > >
> > > BV
> > >
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> >
> > >
> > > Bill Verzal
> > > Technical Consultant
> > > Forbes Technical Consulting
> > > (312) 653-3684
> > > bill_verzal@bcbsil.com
> > > billverzal@imcingular.com (Pager)
> > > 888-428-4025 (Pager)
> > > MailStop: 27.202B
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Michelle
> > > DeVault" To:
> > > aix-l@Princeton.EDU
> > > <adsmigmo@YAHO cc:
> > > O.COM>
> Subject:
> > > /unix linked to /usr/lib/boot/unix_mp - but
> it's
> > a
> > > single
> > > Sent by: "IBM
> > processor
> > > AIX Discussion
> > > List"
> > > <aix-l@Princet
> > > on.EDU>
> > >
> > >
> > > 02/04/2003
> > > 04:28 PM
>
=== message truncated ===

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

**********
The information contained in this communication is confidential, private, proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately at (312)653-6000 in Illinois; (972)766-6900 in Texas; or (800)835-8699 in New Mexico.
**********



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:16:34 EDT