From: Lieberg, Patrick (plieberg@EV3.NET)
Date: Tue May 11 2004 - 16:35:20 EDT
In that case, I doubt it has anything to do with DNS resolution.
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU]On Behalf Of
Karl Jones
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:30 PM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: Re: Sluggish Login
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Yes. Same person, same PC, going to same AIX host, different emulators.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Jolet" <john.jolet@FXFN.COM>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.aix-l
To: <aix-l@Princeton.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: Sluggish Login
> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
> one question..are both of these emulators running on the same box?
> wouldn't you expect a dns issue to manifest for both those if they are
> running on the same box?
>
> Lieberg, Patrick wrote:
>
> >It could be a reverse lookup issue with DNS. You can disable that
temporarily by changing the line in inetd.conf to 'telnetd -a -c'. This
pinpointed the problem for me one time and I found there was a definite
host-resolution issue.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU]On Behalf Of
> >Karl Jones
> >Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 2:43 PM
> >To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
> >Subject: Sluggish Login
> >
> >
> >*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm)
Pro*
> >We have two software applications running on the same AIX 4.3 box. Each
is
> >accessed with a different emulator (don't ask why...): IceTCP and InVue.
> >Performance has been fine and identical through each until lately.
> >
> >In recent weeks, it seems as though the delay for get a login prompt
through
> >InVue has gotten increasingly sluggish (up to 5 minutes, I hear) while
> >IceTCP has no signficant delay. Once logged in, normal performance
ensues.
> >
> >My first thought was DNS resolution but, though I haven't checked
> >configuration (this is a remote site), if I remember correctly, it is set
to
> >a 10.0.0.x address which has not changed. Also, I still wonder why it
would
> >be _increasingly_ slower rather than just an abrupt change.
> >
> >My next thought is that a file system is running low on space for temp
files
> >but I checked that and see nothing.
> >
> >Thoughts?
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________________
> >Message scanned for viruses
> >
> >_____________________________________________________________________
> >This message has been checked for all known viruses
> >
> >
_____________________________________________________________________
Message scanned for viruses
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:17:54 EDT